Read the notes of the client interview, labeled Unit 4 Assignment – Client Interview, in Doc Sharing. Then revise the briefs you completed in Unit 3 (3 briefs attached), incorporating your instructor’s comments and adding two additional sections to each brief:
- Analogizing/Distinguishing: Explain one similarity and one difference between the case being briefed and your client’s facts
- Application to Client’s Facts: Describe how the holding from the case being briefed could be applied to the facts of your client’s case
THESE ARE THE 3 CASE BRIEFS. I HAVE ATTACHED THE FULLY BRIEFED CASES AS WELL FOR YOUR VIEW.
Ex. Case Brief: Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, INC 555 P.2d 696 (1976) 89 N.M> 575 Analogizing/Distinguishing:xxxxxxxxxxxxx Application to Clients Facts:xxxxxxxxxxxx
Ex. Case Brief: Roman v. New Mexico Employment Security Department & Presbyterian Hospital.764 P .2d 1316 (N.M 1988) Analoging/Distinguishing:xxxxxxxxxxx Application to Clients Facts: xxxxxxxxxx
Ex. Case Brief: It’s Burger Time v. New Mexico Department of Labor Security Department, Board of Review. 769 P .2d 88 (1989) Analoging/Distinguishing:xxxxxxx Application to Clients Facts:xxxxxx
BE SURE TO READ THE CLIENT NOTES CAREFULLY (ATTACHED AS WELL)